Monday, March 20, 2006
If you jumped from the roof of building 1 or 2 of the World Trade Center it would take you 12 seconds to hit the ground. However, it took each of those buildings just 15 seconds to collapse the day of the 9/11 attacks.
When a friend of mine brought up a 9/11 conspiracy, I was totally pissed off at him and dismissed him as a lunatic. That was until I saw the video of the “plane” slamming into the Pentagon. That was no “plane” and it opened up Pandora’s Box for me. I will share with you what I have found so far.
After watching the videos of the 9/11 attacks again, I realized something was wrong. Buildings 1 and 2 collapsed too easily; it looks like a demolition and NOT like the result of the impact of the airliners. The video of building 7 was the scariest. That building was not on fire and sustained no damage but just suddenly fell. Not like a collapse from an earthquake but it fell inward like a demolition.
These buildings, because of their height, were built to withstand a direct hit from a commercial airliner but yet they easily collapse from the impact from one. They claimed the fire from the fuel was too much for the frame to handle but the steel framing from the buildings was hurriedly whisked off before they could be tested. Also, most of the fuel was blown outward when the planes hit as the videos clearly show.
I have more questions that either have no answers or unbelievable answers:
• How can buildings this size collapse in just 15 seconds from the impact of a plane when this building was originally designed to withstand an impact from a commercial airliner?
• Building 7 was untouched by an airplane and had no fire damage, so how could it collapse so easily?
• Why was building 7 omitted from the 9/11 Commission Report?
• Why was no airplane debris found at the Pentagon?
• Why did the FBI seize all surveillance videos of the “airplane” colliding with the Pentagon from adjacent businesses just minutes after the impact?
• Why did the government suggest the black boxes on the planes were never found, when workers at the sites claimed they found three of the four (the missing one was at the Pentagon, where no plane debris was found and video suggests something other than a plane hit the building)?
• Why did the FBI tell the National Transportation Safety Board which ALWAYS investigates every airplane crash to stay away from the flight 93 crash site?
These are just a few of the unanswered questions that have prompted a debate which will be talked about for years but will most likely never be answered.
There is also overwhelming evidence suggesting the attacks were know by the Bush administration well in advance but the information was suppressed and ignored. This evidence provided the means by which the attack would happen (commercial airliners) and the target (the World Trade Center buildings) weeks before. Why was this ignored?
When did this all start?
Project For the New American Century began in 1997 by many of the now Bush Administration participants to protect US interests in the world including a plan for energy domination. This plan identified three nations (Iraq, Iran and Syria) as being an obstacle to US interests in the Middle East. Their plan called for a huge boost in defense spending, full spectrum dominance over all nations and regions (including outer space), long term petro-resource control with permanent Middle East bases, and a preemptive war policy against recalcitrant states. However, they openly conceded that such a huge “transformation” would take forever “absent some cataclysmic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor.”
The new “Pearl Harbor” happened on September 11, 2001. I am NOT suggesting our government planned the 9/11 attacks but I am suggesting they were aware of them and did nothing to stop it and might have helped a little. Does this explain why Osama Bin Laden is still on the loose? Why, with all of our technology, has he not been captured? The US trained and funded OBL during the Reagan Administration to fight the Iranians; and these same people are in charge of the Country once again under Bush. Where there is smoke there is often fire.
Eight days after Bush took office he was already planning to invade Iraq and just looking for a reason to do it. What a break for him when the intelligence of the World Trade Center attacks crossed his desk. If you remember it was the events of 9/11 that gave him the support of the entire American population including Congress. He took this opportunity to put the “Project For the New American Century” plan into action.
Some of the most damning evidence of a conspiracy was the reaction of President Bush. While all of this is happening he does not act surprised or alarmed. In retrospect he looks very calm, almost like he knows what is happening. How can this be when the rest of the world was utterly stunned?
No human being could be told of such an event and idly sit and read children’s stories. I imagine other Heads of State were watching the events unfold with bewilderment in their eyes but our President acts like this is no big deal. The only rational explanation for this behavior is that he already knew what was going to happen.
In June 2001 Rumsfeld rewrites the NORAD/FAA air emergency response protocols to require his office's permission in the interceptor launch authorization chain. In the year before this revision the NORAD/FAA emergency response had worked flawlessly 67 times. On 9/11 the system missed four out of four.
Three overlapping air war games were scheduled and run on September 11th that diverted NORAD air assets to Alaska, simulated an East Coast hijacking, and inserted phantom objects into FAA radar screens that confused air controllers on the ground. Why would he do this and why was this information suppressed from the public?
Until recently I would never believe my government was capable of such an atrocity but I also never imagined my government was capable of torturing people until recently either. Now they want to illegally wiretap anybody for any reason without the consent of a judge. I am sorry the Bill of Rights is such an inconvenience for law enforcement but it is there for a reason; checks and balances. What is happening?
You don't believe me; then do your own research. Start here:
http://www.911truth.org/index.php
http://911research.wtc7.net/
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/introduction.html
Special acknowledgments:
Andy R -= For the Title
Jack S – For the argument.
When a friend of mine brought up a 9/11 conspiracy, I was totally pissed off at him and dismissed him as a lunatic. That was until I saw the video of the “plane” slamming into the Pentagon. That was no “plane” and it opened up Pandora’s Box for me. I will share with you what I have found so far.
After watching the videos of the 9/11 attacks again, I realized something was wrong. Buildings 1 and 2 collapsed too easily; it looks like a demolition and NOT like the result of the impact of the airliners. The video of building 7 was the scariest. That building was not on fire and sustained no damage but just suddenly fell. Not like a collapse from an earthquake but it fell inward like a demolition.
These buildings, because of their height, were built to withstand a direct hit from a commercial airliner but yet they easily collapse from the impact from one. They claimed the fire from the fuel was too much for the frame to handle but the steel framing from the buildings was hurriedly whisked off before they could be tested. Also, most of the fuel was blown outward when the planes hit as the videos clearly show.
I have more questions that either have no answers or unbelievable answers:
• How can buildings this size collapse in just 15 seconds from the impact of a plane when this building was originally designed to withstand an impact from a commercial airliner?
• Building 7 was untouched by an airplane and had no fire damage, so how could it collapse so easily?
• Why was building 7 omitted from the 9/11 Commission Report?
• Why was no airplane debris found at the Pentagon?
• Why did the FBI seize all surveillance videos of the “airplane” colliding with the Pentagon from adjacent businesses just minutes after the impact?
• Why did the government suggest the black boxes on the planes were never found, when workers at the sites claimed they found three of the four (the missing one was at the Pentagon, where no plane debris was found and video suggests something other than a plane hit the building)?
• Why did the FBI tell the National Transportation Safety Board which ALWAYS investigates every airplane crash to stay away from the flight 93 crash site?
These are just a few of the unanswered questions that have prompted a debate which will be talked about for years but will most likely never be answered.
There is also overwhelming evidence suggesting the attacks were know by the Bush administration well in advance but the information was suppressed and ignored. This evidence provided the means by which the attack would happen (commercial airliners) and the target (the World Trade Center buildings) weeks before. Why was this ignored?
When did this all start?
Project For the New American Century began in 1997 by many of the now Bush Administration participants to protect US interests in the world including a plan for energy domination. This plan identified three nations (Iraq, Iran and Syria) as being an obstacle to US interests in the Middle East. Their plan called for a huge boost in defense spending, full spectrum dominance over all nations and regions (including outer space), long term petro-resource control with permanent Middle East bases, and a preemptive war policy against recalcitrant states. However, they openly conceded that such a huge “transformation” would take forever “absent some cataclysmic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor.”
The new “Pearl Harbor” happened on September 11, 2001. I am NOT suggesting our government planned the 9/11 attacks but I am suggesting they were aware of them and did nothing to stop it and might have helped a little. Does this explain why Osama Bin Laden is still on the loose? Why, with all of our technology, has he not been captured? The US trained and funded OBL during the Reagan Administration to fight the Iranians; and these same people are in charge of the Country once again under Bush. Where there is smoke there is often fire.
Eight days after Bush took office he was already planning to invade Iraq and just looking for a reason to do it. What a break for him when the intelligence of the World Trade Center attacks crossed his desk. If you remember it was the events of 9/11 that gave him the support of the entire American population including Congress. He took this opportunity to put the “Project For the New American Century” plan into action.
Some of the most damning evidence of a conspiracy was the reaction of President Bush. While all of this is happening he does not act surprised or alarmed. In retrospect he looks very calm, almost like he knows what is happening. How can this be when the rest of the world was utterly stunned?
No human being could be told of such an event and idly sit and read children’s stories. I imagine other Heads of State were watching the events unfold with bewilderment in their eyes but our President acts like this is no big deal. The only rational explanation for this behavior is that he already knew what was going to happen.
In June 2001 Rumsfeld rewrites the NORAD/FAA air emergency response protocols to require his office's permission in the interceptor launch authorization chain. In the year before this revision the NORAD/FAA emergency response had worked flawlessly 67 times. On 9/11 the system missed four out of four.
Three overlapping air war games were scheduled and run on September 11th that diverted NORAD air assets to Alaska, simulated an East Coast hijacking, and inserted phantom objects into FAA radar screens that confused air controllers on the ground. Why would he do this and why was this information suppressed from the public?
Until recently I would never believe my government was capable of such an atrocity but I also never imagined my government was capable of torturing people until recently either. Now they want to illegally wiretap anybody for any reason without the consent of a judge. I am sorry the Bill of Rights is such an inconvenience for law enforcement but it is there for a reason; checks and balances. What is happening?
You don't believe me; then do your own research. Start here:
http://www.911truth.org/index.php
http://911research.wtc7.net/
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/introduction.html
Special acknowledgments:
Andy R -= For the Title
Jack S – For the argument.
Labels: Politics
posted by DarthImmortal at 9:37 AM
4 Comments:
Found you via Laurie's blog. Good stuff here...I will come back often.
As far as 9-11 being a big conspiracy, I'm still going over everything...and you're right, there are questions we need answers to.
I rememember reading somewhere that Building 7's final report will be coming out very soon, this summer I believe. I also remember hearing that the owner made quite a bit of money from insurance.
As far as the Twin Towers being able to withstand the impact of an airliner, I've spoken with several engineers, and they said that the design of the buildings made them quite strong, but they didn't believe either tower could actually stay standing after such an impact.
They said that immediately after the planes hit, they knew they were both going to come crashing down as they did. They weren't surprised at all.
The damage at the Pentagon also makes me wonder. You never see many photographs of that damage.
Great post.
Great post bro..! I agree that something more than meets the eye is going on here. I am skeptical that we will learn what really happened until we are old and working as greeters at Wal-Mart! I think the administration will keep this locked down every bit as tight as the JFK information. For all Americans, I hope my pessimism is overstated.
I find this whole mess very disturbing. I almost wished I would have never found this out.
geeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzzzzus christ......so many morons so few bullets!!!!!!
Post a Comment
<< Home